Note: It is probably a good idea to read the previous post, rational discussions before this.
Now that we've given you an example of what I consider a rational discussion, you (yes, I still delude myself into thinking that someone reads my incomprehensible ramblings) can be asked, then how is that discussions are irrational?
Taking the discussion described in the previous post, I leave you some examples. Some will certainly seem surreal to you, but I assure you that "took" with variants of them in recent weeks, and coming from different people.
Example 1:
Person A: (a present position)
Person B: "I think you're wrong, this and this ..." (presents the reasons)
Person A: (repeats the position initially presented, the reasons for ignoring the opposition of person B)
Person B: "But ... you're only repeating. What you said makes no sense, because ... "(tries to explain the objections submitted)
Person A: "You're not listening to anything I say! You can not talk to you! "
Person B: "?"
Example 2:
Person A: (a present position)
Person B: "I think you're wrong, this and this ..." (presents the reasons)
Person A: "Ah, but these your reasons are invalid, because ..." (because it says that each one of the reasons is invalid)
Person B: (ignoring the arguments of the person A) "You see? Not doing anything more than to say why I'm wrong! You have to be right, right? ... So proud! "
Person A: "...?"
Example 3 (version " Calimero "from above):
Person A: (a present position)
Person B: "I think you're wrong, this and this ..." (presents the reasons)
Person A: "Ah, but these your reasons are invalid, because ..." (because it says that each one of the reasons is invalid)
Person B: (ignoring the arguments of the person) "Okay, you know I never say anything like that! You are always a genius, and I suck! I can never be right to talk to you, right? You make me feel completely useless! You are not minimally concerned with my feelings! "
Person A: "... WTF?"
Maybe then edit this post when I remember more. 
Possibly related posts:
- Rational discussions
- Discussion, subjectivity and irrationality
- FAQ: "The atheism / materialism does not explain the love / friendship / good and evil / poetry / beauty / irrational numbers in mathematics / <another abstracto> example of human concept, then they are wrong / God exists!"
- FAQ: "You are wrong because <repetição afirmação> or belief."
- Response to two critical
