I've mentioned in the problem of "God exists because the universe exists" that the idea of the complexity of the universe implies some kind of creator is not reflected at all in "God is so" or "want to roast" or "Jesus died for our sins " 1 or any other belief or dogma of various religions exist.
"There must be some kind of god / creator," it was right ( is not ) would require just that - that there must be some kind of god. Not imply anything about him (her? They?), About their history, their desires, their morality, or even that it was still "alive" does not imply in any way, that this or that religion are right, and reach this conclusion is just intellectual dishonesty.
The comic above , yesterday, clearly shows this error, unfortunately, very typical ...
- that is, God had to come into the world and be tortured and killed to be able to forgive us [ ↩ ]
Possibly related posts:
- FAQ: "God must exist, otherwise what is the meaning of life, once we die and it's over?"
- FAQ: "And if you're wrong, and God exist? This does not concern you? "
- FAQ: "Without God / religion / the Bible, how can there be morality?"
- FAQ: "The atheism / materialism does not explain the love / friendship / good and evil / poetry / beauty / irrational numbers in mathematics / <another abstracto> example of human concept, then they are wrong / God exists!"
- FAQ: "Whether God exists or not, the church is good for the world, right?"
Labels: teleological argument , SMBC
