New / Atheism, in the PT? starts here .

Archive for Humanity '

History: the relationship between Christianity and democracy

Monday, August 9, 2010

I really enjoyed reading this article .

The irony is that they (churches / Christian denominations) "support" democracy in the few times that suit them, as the issue of gay marriage in California. For those who do not know the story, there was a referendum (at the same time of the last presidential elections in 2008) to ban gay marriage in that state, and after a campaign of lies well funded by the Catholic Church and the Mormons of Utah, ban won with 52% of the vote ... for now a federal judge to determine (and well) that the ban is 100% unconstitutional, is to take a majority to a minority rights, and that most have never properly explained how the ban serves the public good - creating slogans like "Protect Marriage", but when - in open court - the judge asks them what is that marriage is to be protected, can not answer. But with all this, are now complaining that "the people's will" is not being respected, that the judge is "undemocratic" and the like.

What supreme hypocrisy, considering (see initial link) as they tried to "democracy" throughout history ...

The problem of "Spirituality"

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Note: The following is supposedly the book "Natural Atheism" by David Eller (2004). I still have not read the book or, indeed, it is only today that I heard about it, but if this is representative of its contents, will probably be a next purchase. Nor have confirmation that this is the book in question, but I have no reason to doubt this. I saw this in a comment (a little larger than normal) on Facebook, and I can not resist copying it here. The theme is the use of terms like "spiritual" and "spirituality" by atheists and non-believers in general.

My translation, by the way. No idea if this exists in Portuguese.

I contend that this kind of talk is false, and, even more than false, it is anti-human conversation - the kind of conversation that degrades and diminishes human beings and the natural world ... It is the assignment of life itself to another reality, another dimension, distinct from that in which we live every day - and, even more crucially, a reality or dimension to which we have no access ... It is as if we ligássemos an additional source of life and energy, this source could only be from the source of all life and energy - out of us ... And yet we are - weak and insignificant material beings - we have these experiences ... What is usually described as spiritual life is indeed, humanity.

Thus, spirituality is the greatest betrayal of humanity possible. Talk about the spirit and the spiritual alienate the best part of what is to be human - literally, in order to make it weird or separate from ourselves. This conversation says, "This is the best, the exponent of the maximum that I can feel and be - and not me." Thus, minimizes and denigrates the human and natural (as does any dualism) and gives the best of what we are able to plane or reality. Not only deprives us of part of our humanity, but the best part of our humanity, and assigns it to a supernatural world - and so unnatural. In the process, we are diminished. We are alienated from ourselves and convinced that no mere human could be the source of wonder.

But we are the source. Esperience are actually spiritual human experiences - the best, the strongest, the most profound human experiences, but human in it. There is a kind of non-humanity, but a form of ultra-humanity. We are enriched by them and for them, but empobrecemo us when we refuse - or let's be denied - our better nature, and attribute these feelings, and capabilities to non-human, the unknown, and almost certainly the imaginary and unreal ...

Never again shall we say, "I had a spiritual experience." Instead, say ... "I had an experience of life" - or, better yet, "I had a human experience" - and encourage others to do the same.

FAQ: "Whether God exists or not, the church is good for the world, right?"

Monday, February 22, 2010

Unfortunately, the facts suggest the opposite.

First, regarding the "church", I include here not only the Catholic church, but the Protestant churches in general (very influential in the U.S.), and the Muslim theocracies.

Second, it is important to distinguish the crimes made ​​by religion / church, or because of, or on behalf of, crimes simply made ​​by religious (or even members of these churches). In other words, do not blame Christianity for the Holocaust while Hitler was Catholic, not blame the religion or the church itself directly by pedophile Catholic priests - that there is anything in the sacred books or in the "statutes" of the church that leads to committing such crimes. But blame the church in question to give more importance to their reputation than the innocence and lives of innocent children, the law protecting pedophile priests and preventing them to be punished for their crimes, and moving them from parish to parish when their acts are discovered locally. And yes, I blame the Catholic church for having supported on various aspects of the Nazi regime.

Third, I will not include here limited to the past crimes, such as the Inquisition or the Crusades. I note only that the Catholic Church ceased to commit these atrocities has lost only when the absolute power he had, and not to have come to the conclusion that it was wrong and immoral. I think that says a lot.

Fourth, recognize that not all bad - the various churches / religions have done and are effectively acts of charity, no doubt laudable, both small and large scale. Qualify this, however, the fact that it is often more than one way to spread the faith than charity "disinterested" and, anyway, religion is far from being required to commit acts of human kindness.

Anyway, I think the balance is completely negative.

What, in human terms, the problem with religion / church today? These, to get started:

  • sexism: from the Muslim theocracies in extreme cases, where women have no access (on pain of death) to any school education, are themselves condemned if violated (often nothing happens to the rapist), are demonized as being " sexual "who" try "men (innocent, poor things) and so are subjected to the horror that is the forced genital mutilation (the idea is that if you lose completely the ability to have sexual pleasure, no longer will "seduce" men ...), and outside of Islam, all have a Western culture that says the conservative role of women is to have children and obey their husbands ... exactly as it says in the Bible, both Old and New Testaments.
  • opposition to condom use - including through lies, such as "increase the risk of AIDS" - causing suffering and death of millions in Africa, for example, as in many areas there is no source of information than the missionaries. Whether for religious reasons ("God hates contraceptives and / or sex for pleasure"), or by more mundane matters (to maximize the number of believers), this act of genocide is almost an unpardonable crime.
  • opposition (not limited to not do themselves, but where possible taking other rights) to abortion, gay rights (seen as a "moral evil") and euthanasia
  • opposition to sex education - paradoxically, the best way to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and therefore abortions.
  • view of sex (perfectly natural and healthy part of what is to be human) something like "pig" and "immoral."
  • opposition - for reasons that are nothing more than superstition - the promising branches of medicine such as stem cell research , cloning of organs, etc. ..
  • wars and hatred of religious origin - not everyone in the Middle East (see Ireland, for example)
  • protection of pedophile priests, who often are simply moved from one parish to another when their actions become known, showing a total lack of concern for their victims.
  • censorship of opposition to religion, even by non-believers just because the idea that religion is above criticism (eg part of a conviction for Christians (!) and even atheists (!) the publication of cartoons Mohammed, when the only sentence should have been the Muslims who practiced violence and intimidation).
  • children traumatized by ultra-detailed descriptions of hell.
  • attitude anti-intellectualism, anti-education and anti-science (for example, the idea that faith and reason conflict, one should prefer the faith that human reason is unreliable, and so on).
  • cancellation of human curiosity, as they say / think that you have all the answers (not that they are simply "was God").
  • mentality of "living death", which says that life is suffering, not only is "the real thing," that our time in this world is just a test to determine whether or not the salvation of our "soul", that life begins in earnest after we die, causing people to accept their condition and do not try to improve the world they live.
  • violence and terror - especially in Muslim theocracies, in which the "blasphemy" ("a victimless crime," as already described) and apostasy are punishable by death, but also in countries like the U.S., where Christian terrorists blow up abortion clinics, murdering doctors who work in them, and beyond.
  • mutilation of the concept of morality to come to mean simply "obey the whims of a being" - as if this being, if it existed, was above morality.
  • non-payment of taxes, in the case of some of the richest organizations in the world and the world economy being as it is.

More abortion ... now, other opinions

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

For my part, I do not think I will add more to the issue. I've been insulted to have my opinion, to have thought of it, and be sure of it, when today is considered "arrogant" to have an OPINION based on strong thought; only accepts a strong opinion based on emotions. Or authority, or religion, or ... Bah.

Anyway, if anyone wants to comment on my previous posts, and for a change, want to respond to what I wrote (instead of just saying "I am very aggressive") as will be appreciated.

In this post, I will just mention what others have said (outside this blog) on ​​this issue.

First, post a girlfriend named The voluntary interruption of pregnancy ... . It's a bit more detailed than mine, and I think it shows well the two sides of the issue. Go, read and comment. :) Includes arguments like this:

For those unaware, until 10 weeks many women do not have a confirmed pregnancy and have a miscarriage without knowing they were pregnant. The body itself is in charge of "cast" fetuses with severe problems, is part of "natural selection" Darwin, the non-survival of the weak, unviable.

Thus, according to the morality of "no's" (which confuse a human with a cluster of cells is a potential human being), almost all women with sexual life are "mass murderers" and not know it ...

Then I want to show a post I think is totally ridiculous. It comes from an American party, "America First Party" which is basically more Republican than the Republicans. The post is called ... wait for it ... Abortion Leads to Nuclear War . Yes, it seems that Mother Teresa (which may have been many things, but it was not, of course, an intelligent person or culture - or so it was very deceitful, for surely great nonsense saying) said something like that, and the fanatics from around the world take it. So, you know - do not want to see huge mushrooms on the horizon, do not abort. Oh, and ...

It is abhorrent That abortion supporters choose to hide behind the term 'choice' to mask Destroying Their goal of unborn children and immoral behavior without Promoting Responsibility

Destroying children! What a horror! What kind of cruel and inhuman monster would want to ever do such a heinous act? : Shock:

Of course, things are not so. I suggest you leave this alternative ... to be irrational and distorted a cluster of emotions, and be human: think a little. Like this post in response to the earlier statement, he says,

Nuclear bombs have Been used once in war, and I seriously doubt the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki HAD to anything with the abortion, Considering It Was not legally in the U.S. in 1945.

And in response to the idiocy of "destroying children" quoted above,

Let me tell you right now, no one Wants to destroy children. It's Just That Sometimes an abortion is the only option to have the mother keep May from ruining her life or the lives of her future children. Life is not always simple or fair. That's the way it is. I Wish We Could all live in a dream world of magic, but we do not, and Trying to legislate it into reality will not make it so.

It would not have said it better.

The "Good Old Days"

Monday, October 30, 2006

It is common to hear comments regarding the Good Old Days ™. The commentary itself varies, but basically they all boil down to this: once things were better.

This is due in part to the nostalgia, and partly to fear of change. And sometimes, it is also a bad memory: the tendency is to remember the good things and forget the bad.

To all who say "is that once was," I leave you here two pages of a publication (U.S.), 1955. Click on the image below to see it in its original size.

The Good Wife's Guide

Though now to laugh, that at the time was not comedy. It was real. The world was like. Minds were so. People were so.

And now tell me that "nothing has improved," things "the old days were better." Tell me that the human race, despite all its faults, did not evolve, and does not evolve. Tell me that "everything is the same, or worse." Tell me that "we are increasingly immoral." That the solution to humanity's problems was "back to the values ​​of the past."


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Portugal
This work by Dehumanizer is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Portugal .